english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/54304 Cómo citar
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRobino, Luciana-
dc.contributor.authorSauto, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, Nicolás-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, María José-
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Erlen-
dc.contributor.authorNeffa, Florencia-
dc.contributor.authorZeballos, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorScavone, Paola-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-13T15:45:08Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-13T15:45:08Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationROBINO, L., SAUTO, R., MORALES, C., y otros. Presence of intracellular bacterial communities in uroepithelial cells, a potential reservoir in symptomatic and non symptomatic people. BMC Infect Dis [en línea] 2024, 24. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09489-5es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/54304-
dc.description.abstractBackground Urinary tract infection is one of the most common infections in humans, affecting women in more proportion. The bladder was considered sterile, but it has a urinary microbiome. Moreover, intracellular bacteria (IB) were observed in uroepithelial cells from children and women with urinary tract infections (UTIs). Here, we evaluated the presence of IB in urine from healthy people and patients with UTI symptoms. Methods Midstream urine was self-collected from 141 donors, 77 females and 64 males; 72 belonged to the asymptomatic group and 69 were symptomatic. IB was characterized by a culture-dependent technique and visualized by confocal microscopy. Urine was also subjected to the classical uroculture and isolated bacteria were identified by MALDI-TOF. Results One-hundred and fifteen uroculture were positive. A significant association was observed between the presence of symptoms and IB (P = 0.007). Moreover, a significant association between the presence of IB, symptoms and being female was observed (P = 0.03). From the cases with IB, Escherichia coli was the most frequent microorganism identified (34.7%), followed by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (14.2%), Staphylococcus spp (14.2%), and Enterococcus faecalis (10.7%). Intracellular E. coli was associated with the symptomatic group (P = 0.02). Most of the intracellular Staphylococcus spp. were recovered from the asymptomatic group (P = 0.006). Conclusions Intracellular bacteria are present in patients with UTI but also in asymptomatic people. Here, we report for the first time, the presence of S. maltophilia, Staphylococcus spp., and Enterobacter cloacae as intracellular bacteria in uroepithelial cells. These findings open new insights into the comprehension of urinary tract infections, urinary microbiome and future therapies. Uroculture as the gold standard could not be enough for an accurate diagnosis in recurrent or complicated cases.es
dc.description.sponsorshipAgencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII)es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenes
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Infect Dis. 24, 2024es
dc.rightsLas obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)es
dc.subjectUTIes
dc.subjectIntracellular bacterial communitieses
dc.subjectE. colies
dc.subjectStenotrophomonas maltophiliaes
dc.subjectStaphylococcus spp.es
dc.subjectEnterobacter cloacaees
dc.subjectUrinary microbiomees
dc.titlePresence of intracellular bacterial communities in uroepithelial cells, a potential reservoir in symptomatic and non symptomatic peoplees
dc.typeArtículoes
dc.contributor.filiacionRobino Luciana, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Higiene. Unidad Académica Bacteriología y Virología-
dc.contributor.filiacionSauto Rafael, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Higiene. Unidad Académica Bacteriología y Virología-
dc.contributor.filiacionMorales Cecilia, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Higiene. Unidad Académica Bacteriología y Virología-
dc.contributor.filiacionNavarro Nicolás, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (Uruguay). Departamento de Microbiología. Laboratorio de Biofilms Microbianos-
dc.contributor.filiacionGonzález María José, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (Uruguay). Departamento de Microbiología. Laboratorio de Biofilms Microbianos-
dc.contributor.filiacionCruz Erlen, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (Uruguay). Departamento de Microbiología. Laboratorio de Biofilms Microbianos-
dc.contributor.filiacionNeffa Florencia, Administración de los Servicios de Salud del Estado (ASSE) (Uruguay). Hospital Maciel. Servicio de Urología-
dc.contributor.filiacionZeballos Javier, Administración de los Servicios de Salud del Estado (ASSE) (Uruguay). Hospital Maciel. Servicio de Urología-
dc.contributor.filiacionScavone Paola, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (Uruguay). Departamento de Microbiología. Laboratorio de Biofilms Microbianos-
dc.rights.licenceLicencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)es
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12879-024-09489-5-
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos - Instituto de Higiene



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons