english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/51910 Cómo citar
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorTebot, Islamey-
dc.contributor.authorCajarville, Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorRepetto, José Luis-
dc.contributor.authorCirio, Alberto-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-06T12:16:46Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-06T12:16:46Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationTebot, I, Cajarville, C, Repetto, J y Cirio, A. Supplementation with non-fibrous carbohydrates reduced fiber digestibility and did not improve microbial protein synthesis in sheep fed fresh forage of two nutritive values. Animal. [en línea] 2012, 6(4), 617-623es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/51910-
dc.description.abstractTo determine whether non-fibrous carbohydrate (NFC) supplementation improves fiber digestibility and microbial protein synthesis, 18 Corriedale ewes with a fixed intake level (40 g dry matter (DM)/kg BW 0.75) were assigned to three (n56) diets: F5100% fresh temperate forage, FG570% forage130% barley grain and FGM570% forage115% barley grain115% molasses-based product (MBP, Kalori 3000). Two experimental periods were carried out, with late (P1) and early (P2) vegetative stage forage. For P2, ewes were fitted with ruminal catheters. Forage was distributed at 0900 h, 1300 h, 1800 h and 2300 h, and supplement added at 0900 h and 1800 h meals. Digestibility of the different components of the diets, retained N and rumen microbial protein synthesis were determined. At the end of P2, ruminal pH and N-NH3 concentration were determined hourly for 24 h. Supplementation increased digestibility of DM ( P,0.001) and organic matter (OM; P,0.001) and reduced NDF digestibility ( P50.043) in both periods, with greater values in P2 ( P50.008) for the three diets. Daily mean ruminal pH differed ( P,0.05) among treatments: 6.33 (F), 6.15 (FG) and 6.51 (FGM). The high pH in FGM was attributed to Ca(OH)2 in MBP. Therefore, the decreased fiber digestibility in supplemented diets could not be attributed to pH changes. The mean ruminal concentration of N-NH3 was 18.0 mg/dl, without differences among treatments or sampling hours. Microbial protein synthesis was greater in P2 (8.0 g/day) than in P1 (6.1 g/day; P50.006), but treatments did not enhance this parameter. The efficiency of protein synthesis tended to be lower in supplemented groups (16.4, 13.9 and 13.4 in P1, and 20.8, 16.7 and 16.2 gN/kg digestible OM ingested in P2, for F, FG and FGM, respectively; P50.07) without differences between supplements. The same tendency was observed for retained N: 2.55, 1.38 and 1.98 in P1, and 2.28, 1.23 and 1.10 g/day in P2, for F, FG and FGM, respectively; P50.05). The efficiency of microbial protein synthesis was greater in P2 (P50.007). In conclusion, addition of feeds containing NFCs to fresh temperate forage reduced the digestibility of cell walls and did not improve microbial protein synthesis or its efficiency. An increase in these parameters was associated to the early phenological stage of the forage.es
dc.format.extent7 pes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenes
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal, 2012, 6(4), 617-623es
dc.rightsLas obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)es
dc.subject.otherOVINOSes
dc.subject.otherOVEJASes
dc.subject.otherALIMENTACION DE LOS ANIMALESes
dc.subject.otherFORRAJEes
dc.subject.otherDIGESTIBILIDADes
dc.subject.otherSUPLEMENTOS ALIMENTARIOSes
dc.titleSupplementation with non-fibrous carbohydrates reduced fiber digestibility and did not improve microbial protein synthesis in sheep fed fresh forage of two nutritive valueses
dc.typeArtículoes
dc.contributor.filiacionTebot Islamey, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Veterinaria. Instituto de Biociencias. Departamento de Fisiología-
dc.contributor.filiacionCajarville Cecilia, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Veterinaria. Instituto de Producción Animal. Departamento de Nutrición Animal-
dc.contributor.filiacionRepetto José Luis, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Veterinaria. Instituto de Producción Animal. Departamento de Bovinos-
dc.contributor.filiacionCirio Alberto, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Veterinaria. Instituto de Biociencias. Departamento de Fisiología-
dc.rights.licenceLicencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND 4.0)es
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002011-
Aparece en las colecciones: Publicaciones académicas y científicas - Facultad de Veterinaria

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato   
R9.pdf180,89 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons