english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/51259 Cómo citar
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPiacenza, Lucía-
dc.contributor.authorAcosta, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorBasmadjian, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorDalton, John P.-
dc.contributor.authorCarmona, Carlos-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-26T16:16:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-26T16:16:14Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationPIACENZA, L., ACOSTA, D., BASMADJIAN, I., y otros. Vaccination with Cathepsin L Proteinases and with Leucine Aminopeptidase Induces High Levels of Protection against Fascioliasis in Sheep. Infect Immun [en línea] 1999, 67(4). DOI: 10.1128/iai.67.4.1954-1961.1999es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/51259-
dc.description.abstractThe potential of different parasite proteinases for use as vaccine candidates against fascioliasis in sheep was studied by vaccinating animals with the cathepsin L proteinases CL1 and CL2 and with leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) purified from adult flukes. In the first trial, sheep were immunized with CL1 or CL2 and the mean protection levels obtained were 33 and 34%, respectively. Furthermore, a significant reduction in egg output was observed in sheep vaccinated either with CL1 (71%) or with CL2 (81%). The second trial was performed to determine the protective potential of the two cathepsin L proteinases assayed together, as well as in combination with LAP, and of LAP alone. The combination of CL1 and CL2 induced higher levels of protection (60%) than those produced when these enzymes were administered separately. Those sheep that received the cocktail vaccine including CL1, CL2, and LAP were significantly protected (78%) against metacercarial challenge, but vaccination with LAP alone elicited the highest level of protection (89%). All vaccine preparations induced high immunoglobulin G titers which were boosted after the challenge infection, but no correlations between antibody titers and worm burdens were found. However, the sera of those animals vaccinated with LAP contained LAP-neutralizing antibodies. Reduced liver damage, as assessed by the level of the liver enzyme gamma-glutamyl transferase, was observed in the groups vaccinated with CL1, CL2, and LAP or with LAP alone.es
dc.description.sponsorshipConsejo Nacional de Innovación, Ciencia y Tecnología (CONICYT)es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenes
dc.relation.ispartofInfect Immun. 67(4), 1999es
dc.rightsLas obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)es
dc.subject.otherVACCINATIONes
dc.subject.otherCATHEPSIN Les
dc.subject.otherFASCIOLIASISes
dc.subject.otherSHEEPes
dc.titleVaccination with Cathepsin L Proteinases and with Leucine Aminopeptidase Induces High Levels of Protection against Fascioliasis in Sheepes
dc.typeArtículoes
dc.contributor.filiacionPiacenza Lucía, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Higiene. Unidad Académica Laboratorio de Biología Parasitaria-
dc.contributor.filiacionAcosta Daniel, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Higiene. Unidad Académica Laboratorio de Biología Parasitaria-
dc.contributor.filiacionBasmadjian Isabel, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Higiene. Unidad Académica Laboratorio de Biología Parasitaria-
dc.contributor.filiacionDalton John P., Dublin City University (Irlanda). School of Biological Sciences-
dc.contributor.filiacionCarmona Carlos, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Higiene. Unidad Académica Laboratorio de Biología Parasitaria-
dc.rights.licenceLicencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)es
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/iai.67.4.1954-1961.1999-
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos - Instituto de Higiene



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons