Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/41137
Cómo citar
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Casas, Pedro | es |
dc.contributor.author | Larroca, Federico | es |
dc.contributor.author | Rougier, Jean-Louis | es |
dc.contributor.author | Vaton, Sandrine | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-14T17:04:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-14T17:04:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | es |
dc.date.submitted | 20231114 | es |
dc.identifier.citation | Casas, P, Larroca, F, Rougier, JL,Vaton, S. "Taming traffic dynamics: Analysis and improvements" [Preprint] Publicado en Computer Communications, 2012, v.35, no 5, pp. 565-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2010.07.009. | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/41137 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Internet traffic is highly dynamic and difficult to predict in current network scenarios, which enormously complicates network management and resources optimization. To address this uncertainty in a robust and efficient way, two almost antagonist Traffic Engineering (TE) techniques have been proposed in the last years: Robust Routing and Dynamic Load-Balancing. Robust Routing (RR) copes with traffic uncertainty in an off-line preemptive fashion, computing a single static routing configuration that is optimized for traffic variations within some predefined uncertainty set. On the other hand, Dynamic Load-Balancing (DLB) balances traffic among multiple paths in an on-line reactive fashion, adapting to traffic variations in order to optimize a certain congestion function. In this article we present the first comparative study between these two alternative methods. We are particularly interested in the performance loss of RR with respect to DLB, and on the response of DLB when faced with abrupt changes. This study brings insight into several RR and DLB algorithms, evaluating their virtues and shortcomings, which allows us to introduce new mechanisms that improve previous proposals. Keywords: Traffic Uncertainty, Traffic Management, Robust Optimization, Robust Routing, Dynamic Load-Balancing | es |
dc.language | en | es |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es |
dc.rights | Las obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad De La República. (Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014) | es |
dc.subject | Traffic uncertainty | es |
dc.subject | Traffic management | es |
dc.subject | Robust optimization | es |
dc.subject | Robust routing | es |
dc.subject | Dynamic load-balancing | es |
dc.subject.other | Telecomunicaciones | es |
dc.title | Taming Traffic Dynamics: Analysis and Improvements | es |
dc.type | Preprint | es |
dc.rights.licence | Licencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND 4.0) | es |
udelar.academic.department | Telecomunicaciones | - |
udelar.investigation.group | Análisis de Redes, Tráfico y Estadísticas de Servicios | - |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Publicaciones académicas y científicas - Instituto de Ingeniería Eléctrica |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLRV12.pdf | 494,49 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons