english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/10759 Cómo citar
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorLeites, Martines
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Xavieres
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-15T15:56:44Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-15T15:56:44Z-
dc.date.issued2017es
dc.date.submitted20171113es
dc.identifier.citationLeites, M., Ramos, X. "Relative deprivation and economic aspiration : evidence on aspiration failure for a developing country". XVI Jornadas de Investigación : la excepcionalidad uruguaya en debate: ¿como el Uruguay no hay? [en linea]. 2017es
dc.identifier.issn2301-1734es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/10759-
dc.description.abstractThis paper contributes new evidence on the role of relative deprivation and Locus of control (LOC) in income aspiration formation, empirically exploring the validity of the assumptions used by Genicot and Ray (2014) to model aspiration and assessing the presence of aspiration failures in a developing country. Aspiration failures suggest that individuals may reduce their economic aspirations due relative deprivation and the perception that their destiny is beyond their control. This hypothesis is explored using both indirect and direct measures of economic aspirations and considering alternative measures of relative income. We focus on the role of LOC, which provides information about how individuals perceive the causal connection between their actions and experienced outcomes. Estimates are based on a panel survey from Uruguay. The results confirm the relevance of LOC in explaining economic aspiration, but its incidence varies with the domain. While higher internality and relative power lead to higher economic aspiration, fatalistic belief leads to lower aspiration. Furthermore, they confirm the role of relative income in the levels of economic aspiration, but the responses would be asymmetric. This result suggests that relative income is relevant only for individuals with positive relative income, but the incentive effect of reference groups disappears when individuals face relative deprivation. Finally, they show that, among fatalistic individuals, higher relative deprivation reduces economic aspirationen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherUdelar. FCSes
dc.relation.ispartofXVI Jornadas de Investigación : la excepcionalidad uruguaya en debate: ¿como el Uruguay no hay?es
dc.rightsLas obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad De La República. (Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)es
dc.subject.otherPERDIDA ECONOMICAes
dc.subject.otherINGRESOes
dc.subject.otherECONOMIAes
dc.titleRelative deprivation and economic aspiration : evidence on aspiration failure for a developing countryen
dc.typePonenciaes
dc.rights.licenceLicencia Creative Commons Atribución – No Comercial – Sin Derivadas (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)es
Aparece en las colecciones: Jornadas de Investigación - Facultad de Ciencias Sociales

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato   
XVI JICS_Martin-Leites_Xavier-Ramos.pdf1,45 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons