english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/56436 Cómo citar
Título: Guidance for assessment of the inflammation etiologic criterion for the GLIM diagnosis of malnutrition: A modified Delphi approach
Autor: Cederholm, Tommy
Jensen, Gordon L.
Ballesteros-Pomar, Maria D.
Blaauw, Renee
Manzanares, William
Tipo: Artículo
Palabras clave: Malnutrition, Inflammation, Assessment, C-reactive protein
Descriptores: CONSENSO, COSTO DE ENFERMEDAD, INFLAMACIÓN, HUMANOS, DIAGNÓSTICO, DESNUTRICIÓN, PROTEÍNA C-REACTIVA, EVALUACIÓN NUTRICIONAL, PÉRDIDA DE PESO
Fecha de publicación: 2024
Resumen: Background & aims: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) approach to malnutrition diagnosis is based on assessment of three phenotypic (weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced skeletal muscle mass) and two etiologic (reduced food intake/assimilation and disease burden/inflammation) criteria, with diagnosis confirmed by fulfillment of any combination of at least one phenotypic and at least one etiologic criterion. The original GLIM description provided limited guidance regarding assessment of inflammation and this has been a factor impeding further implementation of the GLIM criteria. We now seek to provide practical guidance for assessment of inflammation in support of the etiologic criterion for inflammation. Methods: A GLIM-constituted working group with 36 participants developed consensus-based guidance through a modified-Delphi review. A multi-round review and revision process served to develop seven guidance statements. Results: The final round of review was highly favorable with 99 % overall “agree” or “strongly agree” responses. The presence of acute or chronic disease, infection or injury that is usually associated with inflammatory activity may be used to fulfill the GLIM disease burden/inflammation criterion, without the need for laboratory confirmation. However, we recommend that recognition of underlying medical conditions commonly associated with inflammation be supported by C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements when the contribution of inflammatory components is uncertain. Interpretation of CRP requires that consideration be given to the method, reference values, and units (mg/dL or mg/L) for the clinical laboratory that is being used. Conclusion: Confirmation of inflammation should be guided by clinical judgement based upon underlying diagnosis or condition, clinical signs, or CRP.
Descripción: Tommy Cederholm a b # Gordon L. Jensen c # Maria D. Ballesteros-Pomar d Renee Blaauw e M. Isabel T.D. Correia f Cristina Cuerda g David C. Evans h Ryoji Fukushima i Juan Bernardo Ochoa Gautier j M. Cristina Gonzalez k Andre van Gossum l Leah Gramlich m Joseph Hartono n Steven B. Heymsfield o Harriët Jager-Wittenaar p q Renuka Jayatissa r Heather Keller s Ainsley Malone t William Manzanares u M. Molly McMahon v Yolanda Mendez w Kris M. Mogensen x Naoharu Mori y Maurizio Muscaritoli z Guillermo Contreras Nogales aa Ibolya Nyulasi ab Wendy Phillips ac Matthias Pirlich ad ae Veeradej Pisprasert af Elisabet Rothenberg ag Marian de van der Schueren ah Han Ping Shi ai Alison Steiber aj Marion F. Winkler ak Rocco Barazzoni al † Charlene Compher am †
a Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism, Uppsala University, Sweden b Theme Inflammation & Ageing, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden c Deans Office and Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA d Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, Spain e Division of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa f Food Science Post Graduation Program, Surgery Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil g Nutrition Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain h Trauma, Critical Care, General & Gastrointestinal Surgery, OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA i Department of Health and Dietetics, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo Japan j Hunterdon Medical Center, Flemington, NJ, USA k Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brazil l Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, Hospital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium m Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada n Indonesian Central Army Gatot Soebroto Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia o Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA p Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dietetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands q Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands r Department of Nutrition and Food Science, International Institute of Health Sciences, Colobo, Sri Lanka s Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging and Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada t American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Columbus, OH, USA u Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay v Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Diabetes and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA w Internal Medicine, Clinical Nutrition, Colegio Mexicano de Nutrición Clínica y Terapia Nutricional, Mexico x Department of Nutrition, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA y Department of Palliative and Supportive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Japan z Internal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy aa Hospital Guillermo Almenara EsSalud, Lima Perú ab Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Department of Dietetics, Nutrition and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia ac Morrison Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA ad Praxis Kaisereiche - Imperial Oak Outpatient Clinic, Berlin Germany ae Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Clinical Nutrition, Berlin, Germany af Division of Clinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand ag Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden ah HAN University of Applied Sciences, School of Allied Health, Wageningen University, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, the Netherlands ai Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China aj Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Cleveland, OH, USA ak Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Surgical Nutrition Service, Providence, RI, USA al Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy am Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, and Clinical Nutrition Support Service, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Editorial: Elsevier
EN: Clinical Nutrition. 2024;43(5):1025-1032
Citación: Cederholm T, Jensen G, Ballesteros-Pomar M y otros. Guidance for assessment of the inflammation etiologic criterion for the GLIM diagnosis of malnutrition: A modified Delphi approach. Clinical Nutrition [en línea]. 2024;43(5):1025-1032
Licencia: Licencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND 4.0)
Aparece en las colecciones: Publicaciones Académicas y Científicas - Facultad de Medicina

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato   
Guidance for assessment of the inflammation etiologic criterion.pdfGuidance for assessment of the inflammation etiologic criterion5,29 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons