english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/56333 Cómo citar
Título: Closing the gap: prognostic and predictive biomarker validation for personalized care in a Latin American hormone-dependent breast cancer cohort
Autor: Alves da Quinta, Daniela
Rocha, Darío
Retamales, Javier
Artagaveytia, Nora
Caserta, Benedicta
Greif, Gonzalo
Tipo: Artículo
Palabras clave: Latin America, Breast cancer, Chemotherapy benefit, Molecular signatures, Prognostic, Real-world evidence, Risk of recurrence
Descriptores: NEOPLASIAS DE LA MAMA, PRONÓSTICO, PERSONA DE MEDIANA EDAD, ANCIANO, GENÉTICA, BIOMARCADORES DE TUMOR, METABOLISMO, PATOLOGÍA, ADMINISTRACIÓN DEL TRATAMIENTO FARMACOLÓGICO, ESTUDIOS DE COHORTES, MUJERES, RECEPTOR ErbB-2, EPIDEMIOLOGÍA, RECURRENCIA LOCAL DE NEOPLASIA, NEOPLASIAS HORMONO-DEPENDIENTES, MEDICINA DE PRECISIÓN, MÉTODOS
Fecha de publicación: 2024
Resumen: Background: Several guidelines recommend the use of different classifiers to determine the risk of recurrence (ROR) and treatment decisions in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer. However, data are still lacking for their usefulness in Latin American (LA) patients. Our aim was to evaluate the comparative prognostic and predictive performance of different ROR classifiers in a real-world LA cohort. Methods: The Molecular Profile of Breast Cancer Study (MPBCS) is an LA case-cohort study with 5-year follow-up. Stages I and II, clinically node-negative HR+HER2- patients (n = 340) who received adjuvant hormone therapy and/or chemotherapy, were analyzed. Time-dependent receiver-operator characteristic-area under the curve, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression (CPHR) models were used to compare the prognostic performance of several risk biomarkers. Multivariate CPHR with interaction models tested the predictive ability of selected risk classifiers. Results: Within this cohort, transcriptomic-based classifiers such as the recurrence score (RS), EndoPredict (EP risk and EPClin), and PAM50-risk of recurrence scores (ROR-S and ROR-PC) presented better prognostic performances for node-negative patients (univariate C-index 0.61-0.68, adjusted C-index 0.77-0.80, adjusted hazard ratios [HR] between high and low risk: 4.06-9.97) than the traditional classifiers Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index (univariate C-index 0.53-0.59, adjusted C-index 0.72-0.75, and adjusted HR 1.85-2.54). RS (and to some extent, EndoPredict) also showed predictive capacity for chemotherapy benefit in node-negative patients (interaction P = .0200 and .0510, respectively). Conclusion: In summary, we could prove the clinical validity of most transcriptomic-based risk classifiers and their superiority over clinical and immunohistochemical-based methods in the heterogenous, real-world node-negative HR+HER2- MPBCS cohort.
Descripción: Daniela Alves da Quinta 1 2, Darío Rocha 3, Javier Retamales 4, Diego Giunta 5, Nora Artagaveytia 6, Carlos Velazquez 7, Adrian Daneri-Navarro 8, Bettina Müller 9, Eliana Abdelhay 10, Alicia I Bravo 11, Mónica Castro 12, Cristina Rosales 13, Elsa Alcoba 13, Gabriela Acosta Haab 13, Fernando Carrizo 11, Irene Sorin 10, Alejandro Di Sibio 14, Márcia Marques-Silveira 15, Renata Binato 10, Benedicta Caserta 16, Gonzalo Greif 17, Alicia Del Toro-Arreola 8, Antonio Quintero-Ramos 8, Jorge Gómez 18, Osvaldo L Podhajcer 1, Elmer A Fernández 19 20 21; LACRN Investigators; Andrea S Llera 1
Affiliations 1Laboratorio de Terapia Molecular y Celular, Fundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2Universidad Argentina de la Empresa (UADE), Instituto de Tecnología (INTEC), Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Córdoba, Argentina. 4Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo Chileno de Investigación, Santiago de Chile, Chile. 5Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6Hospital de Clínicas Manuel Quintela, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. 7Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico. 8Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico. 9Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, Santiago de Chile, Chile. 10Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 11Hospital Regional de Agudos Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 12Instituto de Oncología Angel Roffo, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 13Hospital Municipal de Oncología María Curie, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 14Hospital General de Agudos "Dr.Cosme Argerich", Buenos Aires, Argentina. 15Molecular Oncology Research Center, Hospital do Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, Brazil. 16Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay. 17Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay. 18Health Sciences Center, Texas A&M University, Bryan, TX 77807, United States. 19Fundación para el Progreso de la Medicina, Laboratorio de Investigación en Cáncer, Córdoba, Argentina. 20CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina. 21FCEFyN, Depto. de Computación, Escuela de Ingeniería Biomédica, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Editorial: AlphaMed Press
EN: Oncologist. 2024;29(12):1701-1713
Citación: Alves da Quinta D, Rocha D, Retamales J y otros. Closing the gap: prognostic and predictive biomarker validation for personalized care in a Latin American hormone-dependent breast cancer cohort. Oncologist [en línea]. 2024;29(12):1701-1713
Cobertura geográfica: AMÉRICA LATINA
Licencia: Licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)
Aparece en las colecciones: Publicaciones Académicas y Científicas - Facultad de Medicina

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato   
Closing the gap.pdfClosing the gap6,55 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons