english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/55068 Cómo citar
Título: Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure
Autor: Yi-Bang, Cheng
Thijs, Lutgarde
Aparicio, Lucas S.
Qi-Fang, Huang
Fang-Fei, Wei
Yu-Ling, Yu
Barochiner, Jessica
Chang-Sheng, Sheng
Wen-Yi, Yang
Niiranen, Teemu J.
Boggia, José
Zhen-Yu, Zhang
Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna
Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza
Tikhonoff, Valérie
Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
Casiglia, Edoardo
Narkiewicz, Krzysztof
Filipovský, Jan
Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina
Ji-Guang, Wang
Yan, Li
Staessen, Jan A.
Tipo: Artículo
Palabras clave: Bbrachial blood pressure, Cardiovascular risk, Central blood pressure, Hypertension, Mortality, Population science
Descriptores: FISIOLOGÍA, PRESIÓN SANGUÍNEA, DETERMINACIÓN DE LA PRESIÓN SANGUÍNEA, HUMANOS, ARTERIA BRAQUIAL, HIPERTENSIÓN, EPIDEMIOLOGÍA, DIAGNÓSTICO, PERSONA DE MEDIANA EDAD, MEDICIÓN DE RIESGO
Fecha de publicación: 2022
Resumen: Background: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. Methods: In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software. Results: Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1-111.8), 120.2 (119.4-121.0), 130.0 (129.6-130.3), and 149.5 (148.4-150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58-2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21-4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41-2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37-10.06) and 2.60 (1.35-5.00), respectively. Conclusions: Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension.
Descripción: International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (IDCARS) Investigators
Editorial: American Heart Association
EN: Hypertension. 2022;79:1101-1111
Citación: Yi-Bang C, Thijs L, Aparicio L y otros. Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure. Hypertension [en línea]. 2022;79:1101-1111.11 p.
Licencia: Licencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND 4.0)
Aparece en las colecciones: Publicaciones Académicas y Científicas - Facultad de Medicina
Publicaciones Académicas y Científicas - Facultad de Medicina

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato   
Risk Stratification by Cross Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure.pdfRisk Stratification by Cross Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure17,36 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons