english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/52133 Cómo citar
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Mota, Luis Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Barrera, Miguel Ángel-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Contreras, Rene-
dc.contributor.authorGrazioli, Guillermo-
dc.contributor.authorZamarripa Calderón, Eliezer-
dc.contributor.authorRivera-Gonzaga, José Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorCuevas-Suárez, Carlos Enrique-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-17T15:18:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-17T15:18:54Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Mota, L, Fernández-Barrera, M, Garcia-Contreras, R, [y otros autores]. "Adhesive performance of pit and fissure sealants on deproteinized enamel with different proteolytic agents: in vitro study". Dentistry Journal. [en línea] 2024, 12, 206.es
dc.identifier.issn2304-6767-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/52133-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this work was to assess the efficacy of different proteolytic agents on the bond strength of pit and fissure sealants to bovine enamel. Eighty-four bovine enamel specimens were randomly assigned in groups according to the pit and fissure sealant applied (HelioSeal F or Dyad Flow). Then, the specimens were subdivided according to the proteolytic agent used (n = 7): Group 1, distilled water (control); Group 2, 10 wt.% Tergazyme®; Group 3, 10 wt.% ZYME®; Group 4, 10% papain gel; Group 5, 10% bromelain gel; and Group 6, 5.25 wt.% sodium hypochlorite. The cell viability of the proteolytic solutions was assessed through the MTT assay. The proteolytic agents were applied on the enamel surface prior to the acid-etching procedure; then, the pit and fissure sealants were placed. The micro-shear bond strength was evaluated after 24 h or 6 months of water storing at 37 ◦C. Representative SEM images were taken for each experimental group. The bond strength data were statistically analyzed by a three-way ANOVA test using a significance level of α = 0.05. Bromelain and papain proteolytic solutions did not exert any cytotoxic effect on the human dental pulp cells. After 24 h and 6 months of aging, for both pit and fissure sealants, sodium hypochlorite, papain, bromelain, and Tergazyme® achieved statistically significant higher bond strength values (p < 0.05). Irrespective of the deproteinizing agent used, Dyad Flow resulted in a better bond strength after 6 months of aging. The type 1 etching pattern was identified for sodium hypochlorite, papain, and bromelain. Tergazyme®, papain, and bromelain demonstrated efficacy in deproteinizing enamel surfaces prior to acid etching, leading to the improved bond strength of pit and fissure sealants. Clinically, this suggests that these proteolytic agents can be considered viable alternatives to traditional methods for enhancing sealant retention and longevity. Utilizing these agents in dental practice could potentially reduce sealant failures.es
dc.format.extent12 h.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoen_USes
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relation.ispartofDentistry Journal, 2024, 12, 206.es
dc.rightsLas obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)es
dc.subjectShear bond strengthes
dc.subjectDeproteinizing agentses
dc.subjectAcid etch patternes
dc.subjectTergazymees
dc.subjectZYMEes
dc.subject.otherPAPAÍNAes
dc.subject.otherPAPAINes
dc.subject.otherBROMELAÍNASes
dc.subject.otherBROMELAINSes
dc.subject.otherHIPOCLORITO DE SODIOes
dc.subject.otherSODIUM HYPOCHLORITEes
dc.titleAdhesive performance of pit and fissure sealants on deproteinized enamel with different proteolytic agents: in vitro study.es
dc.typeArtículoes
dc.contributor.filiacionGarcía-Mota Luis Francisco, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (México).-
dc.contributor.filiacionFernández-Barrera Miguel Ángel, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (México).-
dc.contributor.filiacionGarcia-Contreras Rene, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México).-
dc.contributor.filiacionGrazioli Guillermo, Universidad de la Repúbica (Uruguay). Facultad de Odontología. Departamento de Odontología Preventiva y Restauradora.-
dc.contributor.filiacionZamarripa Calderón Eliezer, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (México).-
dc.contributor.filiacionRivera-Gonzaga José Alejandro, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (México).-
dc.contributor.filiacionCuevas-Suárez Carlos Enrique, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (México).-
dc.rights.licenceLicencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/dj12070206-
Aparece en las colecciones: Publicaciones académicas y científicas 2020- - Facultad de Odontología

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato   
103390dj12070206.pdf1,05 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons