english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44579 How to cite
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPizard, Sebastián-
dc.contributor.authorLezama, Joaquín-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorVallespir, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorKitchenham, Barbara-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T12:26:51Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-28T12:26:51Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationPizard, S., Lezama, J., García, R. y otros. Using rapid review to support software engineering practice: a citation analysis and a replication study [Preprint]. Montevideo, 2024.es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44579-
dc.descriptionUna versión mejorada del artículo fue aceptado para ser publicado en el Empirical Software Engineering Journal con el título "Using Rapid Reviews to Support Software Engineering Practice: A Systematic Review and a Replication Study". Por más información contactarse con spizard@fing.edu.uy.-
dc.description.abstractContext: A few years ago rapid reviews (RR) were introduced in software engineering (SE) to address problems that standard systematic reviews take too long and too much effort to be of value to practitioners. Prior to our study, few practice-driven RRs had been reported and none of them considered collaborating with RRs for practitioners lacking SE research experience. Objective: To investigate practitioners’ perspectives on the use of RRs in supporting SE practices, we aimed to validate and build upon the findings of the seminal RR in SE study, specifically considering practitioners without explicit SE research experience. Method: First, we studied previously conducted RRs in SE using citation analysis. Second, we carried out an external replication of the first study that proposed the use of RRs in SE. Specifically, we conducted an RR for an agile software development team looking to improve its knowledge management practices. Results: Most of the participants’ perceptions about RR results were positive and strongly consistent with previous research. In particular, RR results were considered more reliable than other sources of information and adequate to address the problems detected. Some months later they confirmed using some of the recommendations. Conclusions: The results show that practitioners without explicit SE research experience appreciate the value of evidence and can make use of the results of RRs. However, SE research may need to be translated from broad recommendations to specific process change options. Our research also reveals that SE RRs reporting needs to be substantially improved.es
dc.format.extent56 p.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsLas obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)es
dc.subjectRapid reviewes
dc.subjectAction researches
dc.subjectReplication studyes
dc.subjectIndustry–academia collaborationes
dc.titleUsing rapid review to support software engineering practice: a citation analysis and a replication study.es
dc.typePreprintes
dc.contributor.filiacionPizard Sebastián, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ingeniería.-
dc.contributor.filiacionLezama Joaquín, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ingeniería.-
dc.contributor.filiacionGarcía Rodrigo, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ingeniería.-
dc.contributor.filiacionVallespir Diego, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ingeniería.-
dc.contributor.filiacionKitchenham Barbara, Keele University (Reino Unido). School of Computing and Mathematics.-
dc.rights.licenceLicencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND 4.0)es
Appears in Collections:Publicaciones académicas y científicas - Facultad de Ingeniería

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
PLGVL24.pdfPreprint829,82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons