Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44572
How to cite
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pizard, Sebastián | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vallespir, Diego | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kitchenham, Barbara | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-27T17:31:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-27T17:31:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Pizard, S., Vallespir, D. y Kitchenham, B. Evidence-based software engineering revisited: evaluation of a practice-driven application [Preprint]. Montevideo, 2024. | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44572 | - |
dc.description | Artículo enviado al IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. En proceso de revisión. | es |
dc.description.abstract | Systematic reviews (SRs) are the main method for supporting evidence-based software engineering (EBSE). However, although SRs have been widely adopted by SE researchers, so far, there have been no studies assessing the value of the broader EBSE framework. Objective: To evaluate an EBSE application in an industry environment. Method: Using the participant observation method, we conducted an EBSE-based project to address an industry problem. This includes collaborating with practitioners to diagnose the problem, collect evidence through a rapid review (RR), and transfer the results to the company. Results: The practitioners utilized some recommendations that addressed their problems. The biggest barriers we encountered were the difficulty in finding relevant evidence, the complexity of applying evidence, and the lack of guidelines or examples of EBSE use. Factors that supported our project were: close collaboration with the company and its commitment to process improvement, appropriate dissemination of the results, using an RR, and participation of external researchers. Conclusions: Currently, the use of EBSE is challenging and requires both professional and research skills. While it is a valuable instrument for researchers to enhance collaboration with industry, it may not be as suitable for general use by practitioners, as initially hoped. | es |
dc.format.extent | 16 p. | es |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es |
dc.language.iso | en | es |
dc.rights | Las obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014) | es |
dc.subject | Evidence-based software engineering | es |
dc.subject | Rapid review | es |
dc.subject | Knowledge transfer | es |
dc.subject | Evidencebased practice | es |
dc.subject | Participant observation | es |
dc.subject | Industry academia collaboration | es |
dc.title | Evidence-based software engineering revisited: evaluation of a practice-driven application. | es |
dc.type | Preprint | es |
dc.contributor.filiacion | Pizard Sebastián, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ingeniería. | - |
dc.contributor.filiacion | Vallespir Diego, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ingeniería. | - |
dc.contributor.filiacion | Kitchenham Barbara, Keele University (Reino Unido). School of Computing and Mathematics. | - |
dc.rights.licence | Licencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND 4.0) | es |
Appears in Collections: | Publicaciones académicas y científicas - Facultad de Ingeniería |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License