english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44572 How to cite
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPizard, Sebastián-
dc.contributor.authorVallespir, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorKitchenham, Barbara-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-27T17:31:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-27T17:31:08Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationPizard, S., Vallespir, D. y Kitchenham, B. Evidence-based software engineering revisited: evaluation of a practice-driven application [Preprint]. Montevideo, 2024.es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44572-
dc.descriptionArtículo enviado al IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. En proceso de revisión.es
dc.description.abstractSystematic reviews (SRs) are the main method for supporting evidence-based software engineering (EBSE). However, although SRs have been widely adopted by SE researchers, so far, there have been no studies assessing the value of the broader EBSE framework. Objective: To evaluate an EBSE application in an industry environment. Method: Using the participant observation method, we conducted an EBSE-based project to address an industry problem. This includes collaborating with practitioners to diagnose the problem, collect evidence through a rapid review (RR), and transfer the results to the company. Results: The practitioners utilized some recommendations that addressed their problems. The biggest barriers we encountered were the difficulty in finding relevant evidence, the complexity of applying evidence, and the lack of guidelines or examples of EBSE use. Factors that supported our project were: close collaboration with the company and its commitment to process improvement, appropriate dissemination of the results, using an RR, and participation of external researchers. Conclusions: Currently, the use of EBSE is challenging and requires both professional and research skills. While it is a valuable instrument for researchers to enhance collaboration with industry, it may not be as suitable for general use by practitioners, as initially hoped.es
dc.format.extent16 p.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsLas obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)es
dc.subjectEvidence-based software engineeringes
dc.subjectRapid reviewes
dc.subjectKnowledge transferes
dc.subjectEvidencebased practicees
dc.subjectParticipant observationes
dc.subjectIndustry academia collaborationes
dc.titleEvidence-based software engineering revisited: evaluation of a practice-driven application.es
dc.typePreprintes
dc.contributor.filiacionPizard Sebastián, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ingeniería.-
dc.contributor.filiacionVallespir Diego, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ingeniería.-
dc.contributor.filiacionKitchenham Barbara, Keele University (Reino Unido). School of Computing and Mathematics.-
dc.rights.licenceLicencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND 4.0)es
Appears in Collections:Publicaciones académicas y científicas - Facultad de Ingeniería

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
PVK24.pdfPreprint676,79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons