english Icono del idioma   español Icono del idioma  

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/31774 Cómo citar
Título: Can changes in implant macrogeometry accelerate the osseointegration process?: An in vivo experimental biomechanical and histological evaluations
Autor: Gehrke, S.A.
Aramburú Júnior, J.
Pérez-Díaz, Leticia
Dias do Prado, T.
Dedavid, B.A.
Mazón, P.
De Aza, P.N.
Tipo: Artículo
Editor: Pérez, M.A.
Palabras clave: Experimental implants, Osseointegration, Biomechanical phenomena, Titanium, Prosthesis design
Fecha de publicación: 2020
Resumen: Objectives The propose was to compare this new implant macrogeometry with a control implant with a conventional macrogeometry. Materials and methods Eighty-six conical implants were divided in two groups (n = 43 per group): group control (group CON) that were used conical implants with a conventional macrogeometry and, group test (group TEST) that were used implants with the new macrogeometry. The new implant macrogeometry show several circular healing cambers between the threads, distributed in the implant body. Three implants of each group were used to scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) analysis and, other eighty samples (n = 40 per group) were inserted the tibia of ten rabbit (n = 2 per tibia), determined by randomization. The animals were sacrificed (n = 5 per time) at 3-weeks (Time 1) and at 4-weeks after the implantations (Time 2). The biomechanical evaluation proposed was the measurement of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) and the removal torque values (RTv). The microscopical analysis was a histomorphometric measurement of the bone to implant contact (%BIC) and the SEM evaluation of the bone adhered on the removed implants. Results The results showed that the implants of the group TEST produced a significant enhancement in the osseointegration in comparison with the group CON. The ISQ and RTv tests showed superior values for the group TEST in the both measured times (3- and 4-weeks), with significant differences (p < 0.05). More residual bone in quantity and quality was observed in the samples of the group TEST on the surface of the removed implants. Moreover, the %BIC demonstrated an important increasing for the group TEST in both times, with statistical differences (in Time 1 p = 0.0103 and in Time 2 p < 0.0003). Conclusions Then, we can conclude that the alterations in the implant macrogeometry promote several benefits on the osseointegration process
Editorial: Public Library of Science
EN: PLos ONE, 2020, 15(5): e0233304
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233304
ISSN: 1932-6203
Citación: Gehrke, S, Aramburú Júnior, J, Pérez-Díaz, L, [y otros] "Can changes in implant macrogeometry accelerate the osseointegration process?: An in vivo experimental biomechanical and histological evaluations". PLos ONE. [en línea] 2020, 15 (5). 19 h. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233304
Licencia: Licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)
Aparece en las colecciones: Publicaciones académicas y científicas - Facultad de Ciencias

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato   
10.1371journal.pone.0233304.pdf4,55 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons