Título:
Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment
Otros títulos:
Coordinador:
Director:
Compilador:
Autor:
Yic, Christian D.
Prada, Gabriel
Paz, Sergio I.
Moraes, Leandro
Pontet, Julio C.
Lasso, Marcos E.
Biestro, Alberto
Prada, Gabriel
Paz, Sergio I.
Moraes, Leandro
Pontet, Julio C.
Lasso, Marcos E.
Biestro, Alberto
Tutor:
Tipo de documento:
Artículo
Editor:
Palabras clave:
Brain herniation
Ocular ultrasonography
Ocular ultrasound
Pupillary assessment
Pupillometry
Traumatic brain injury
Ocular ultrasonography
Ocular ultrasound
Pupillary assessment
Pupillometry
Traumatic brain injury
Descriptores:
PUPILA
ULTRASONOGRAFÍA
LESIONES TRAUMÁTICAS DEL ENCÉFALO
ENCEFALOCELE
ULTRASONOGRAFÍA
LESIONES TRAUMÁTICAS DEL ENCÉFALO
ENCEFALOCELE
Año de publicación:
2020
Contenido:
Resumen:
Objectives: To evaluate the correlation between ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessments in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients.
Design: Prospective, observational study.
Setting: Tertiary teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Montevideo, Uruguay.
Patients: Twenty-six adults patients with age 18 or older admitted to the intensive care unit with and without neurologic pathology. A total of 212 pupillary measures were made between ultrasonographic pupillary assessment (UPA) and infrared pupillary assessment (IPA).
Interventions: This was a study that utilized non-invasive (minimal risk) ultrasonographic and infrared pupillary assessment in patients admitted to the ICU. Time between UPA and IPA in a single patient was consistently less than 3 min.
Measurements and main results: There was a strong positive association between UPA and IPA (right eye [OD]: r = de 0.926, p-value < 0.001; left eye [OS], r = 0.965, p-value < 0.001), also observed in the group of neurocritically ill patients (OD: r = 0.935, p-value < 0.001; OS: r = de 0.965, p-value < 0.001). Taking IPA as reference measure, the percent error for all subjects was 2.77% and 2.15% for OD and OS, respectively, and for neurocritically ill patients it was 3.21% and 2.44% for OD and OS, respectively.
Conclusions: Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is strongly correlated with infrared pupillary assessment in critically ill patients, including neurocritically ill patients. Ultrasonographic pupillary assessment is a quick, feasible, non-invasive method that allows accurate pupillary assessment, particularly neurologic function, in patients in whom a more precise measurement of the pupil is required or eye opening is not possible (e.g., periorbital edema due to traumatic brain injury).
Descripción:
metadata.articulos.dc.description.uri:
Editorial:
Springer Milan
EN:
Ultrasound Journal. 2020;12(1)
Financiadores:
Citación:
Yic C, Prada G, Paz S y otros. Comparison of ultrasonographic versus infrared pupillary assessment. Ultrasound Journal [en línea]. 2020;12(1). 10 p.
Citación:
metadata.articulos.cc.license.name:
ISBN:
e-ISBN:
ISSN:
ISMN:
Otros identificadores:
Cobertura geográfica:
Cobertura temporal:
Departamento académico:
Grupo de investigación:
Licencia:
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)
Colecciones:
| Ficheros | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison of ultrasonographic.pdf | Comparison of ultrasonographic | 3.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
